Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Quiop's avatar

A frequent complaint about the US regulatory system is that manufacturers selling "medicines" need to demonstrate the efficacy of their products to the satisfaction of the FDA, while those selling "supplements" merely need to demonstrate their safety. (I believe the safety standards for supplements may also be somewhat different from those for medicines, but I'm not sure about the details.) Can you comment on how the Australian regulatory system handles this sort of distinction?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts